Overall Program Evaluation

 
 
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
A. Program ORGANIZATION
B. Effectiveness of speaker COMMUNICATION
C. Attainment of Symposia OBJECTIVES
D. CLINICAL RELEVANCE of Symposia
E. Quality of VISUAL MATERIALS (e.g. slides, etc.)
F. Quality of AUDIENCE DISCUSSION / INTERACTION
G. OVERALL RATING of these Symposia
H. RELEVANCE to day-to-day practice
I. FREEDOM from commercial bias (NANOS Organized sessions only; does NOT include the Horizon Therapeutics symposium and Vindico Medical symposiums)


Please rate the Virtual Event Platform:

 
 
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Poster Hall
Lounge
Chat Rooms
Exhibit Hall
Fellowship Hall
Info Desk
Auditorium
1:1 Chat Feature
Swag Bag
Ease of Use



Event Communications - Please rate the following:

 
 
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Pre-meeting emails
Daily emails during the meeting
Event Platform Video Tutorial
Pop-up notifications within the virtual event platform
Social media presence (Twitter & Facebook)

Was the frequency of communication...


Please rate the overall event communications (e-mail, video, in-platform)

 
 
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Helpfulness of content
Frequency
Delivery (email, video, Pop-up notifications within the virtual event platform)


Is the amount of platform time...


Is the amount of symposium time....


Syllabus materials were....


Is the total length of the meeting....


Would you recommend this meeting to a colleague?







Future Meetings



What is most important to you in terms of the meeting destination?


What time of year is preferred for the NANOS Meeting (keeping in mind competing congresses/meetings)?

 

How many NANOS annual meetings have you attended in the past 10 years?


If you have attended 2 or less, what is the primary factor that keeps you from attending our meeting?





















How will the topics covered during the NANOS meeting change the following: